2. In light of the favorable circumstances that the Defendant appears to be receiving treatment for alcohol addiction, the lower court determined the sentence (two years of imprisonment) by taking account of various sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s failure to recover damage; (b) the likelihood of not restoring damage; and (c) the likelihood of expectation; and (d) the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime; and (b) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime, and conditions after the crime.

In the trial, the above sentencing conditions have been changed.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and if the above sentencing conditions are considered, the court below's punishment is judged appropriate.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.