However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 16, 2017, the Defendant forced the Defendant to provide money in KRW 100,000 per annum from the month in which he/she had her friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend.

It received four copies of the victim's exposure photographs from the injured party by delivering the message "I see as shown in the letter, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, and h, h, h, h, h, and h, h

Since then, when the Defendant refused to send the victim’s additional exposed photographs, the Defendant used the above exposed photographs received on July 19, 2017 to see the victim’s “Nr.e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.,

The telephone number, face, she is already exposed to and out of, and name and school is also called, and the author now does not have any relation to him/her, and on the other hand, he/she is crypted with a photographic face face crypted by a vagach name.

The “intimidating the victim,” and forced the victim fluent of fluencing, to deliver 18 copies of exposure photographs and 6 video images to the victim from July 19, 2017 to August 19, 2017, through mobile hosting method F, thereby compelling the victim to perform an unobligatory act.

2. From July 16, 2017 to August 19, 2017, Defendant 1, as seen above, distributed, provided, or openly displayed a video call to G, which is a SNS sharing site, to make it possible for many unspecified people to view the face of the said victim who is a juvenile from July 16, 2017, via a transmission of a telegraph exposure photograph and a video to be seen as the chest and a video image, and possessed a child’s obscene material. On August 19, 2017, Defendant 2: (a) distributed, provided, or openly displayed, a video call to G, which is a SNS sharing site, to make it possible for many and unspecified persons to view.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Smartphones.