1. On April 14, 2017, at around 16:00, Defendant A appeared and taken an oath as a witness of an indecent act case by force against the Seoul Eastern District Court 303, the Seoul Eastern District Court 301, the Seoul Eastern District Court 2016 order 3614D, which was located in Songpa-gu Seoul, as the Seoul Songpa-gu court, and the following facts are acknowledged by modifying the charges stated in the indictment, “The Defendant does not continue to maintain D and the victim E, and even though he was unable to fully know whether D was under the victim’s buckbuck by attracting her hand, the Defendant was compelled to commit an indecent act by inserting her hand.”

Defendant

B is also the same as in B.

변호인의 ‘ 피해자는 피고인이 피해자의 양손을 잡아 주무르거나 비볐고 이후 피해자의 양손을 피고인의 양손으로 잡아당겨 피고인의 허벅지와 테이블 사이에 넣고 3-4 분 동안 빼지 못하도록 잡고 있었다고

In addition, I did not have such an act in itself in the question of “I’t have any such an act.”

In response, the Prosecutor’s question “I cannot see that the Defendant was placed in the buckbucks by taking the victim’s hand while the witness complies with, and whether the witness may be able to be able to be able to do so when see another place.”

Since he was sitting on the table table, she was sweed to sweed off unless he or she was sweed back.

The answer to "the defendant and the victim have been continuously observed at the time of committing the crime" by the prosecutor, and the question "It is not necessary to say that the defendant has the head in the Hebucks by drawing the victim's hand, and that the defendant does not have this face," I accurately see that the time from the orders for food is not longer time and that the proposal is not a longer time and accurate.

‘The answer' of the prosecutor, ‘the witness' of the prosecutor shall judge the defendant and the victim from the time of meal to the time of completion, and shall take the victim's grandchildren except that of the defendant's bad faith.