However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for a period of one year and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is an assistant business entity selected as one of the recipients of F projects promoted from D to D as a part of the “E project” in 2016 while cultivating B and two parcels, and Defendant B is a contractor who was requested by Defendant A to install a water supply facility of a subsidized project while operating “H” in G.

No person shall receive local subsidies by fraudulent application or by other unlawful means.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired by deceiving D and I, the victim, by submitting the settlement documents, such as personnel expenses, which were falsely unfilled in connection with the subsidized projects, to the public officials in charge of such affairs, and by receiving the Do and military expenses from the victims.

On June 28, 2016, the Defendants, at the “K-Eup Office” Agricultural Support Division located in J, drafted a false statement of claim and receipt of the human labor labor labor labor cost of KRW 5 million from L, M, N, andO to four employees in relation to the subsidized project, and submitted a false statement of claim and receipt of the human labor labor labor cost of KRW 5 million, a false statement of claim and receipt of the human labor labor labor cost of KRW 1,000,000, and submitted a false statement of personal labor cost to a public official in charge of the personal labor cost of such fact.

However, there was no fact that L et al. provided labor in relation to the subsidized project, and there was no fact that the defendants paid 5 million won or more to L et al.

As above, the Defendants deceiving a public official in charge of false names, and transferred KRW 12,977,275 from the victim D to the NongHyup Bank account (P) in the name of Defendant A on July 7, 2016, and received KRW 12,977,275 from the victim I to the same account on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to acquire the property of the victim and received the local subsidy by false application.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol (including attached documents) against the Defendants

1. An investigation report (a counter investigation of false copies);

1.F projects, 2016.