2. Determination is reasonable to view that the Defendant was a primary offender with no criminal punishment power, and the assault on October 2, 2016, when the Defendant and the victim were married to the same day before the Defendant gets married, and the assault and assault on May 25, 2017

8. 28. The assault committed on the 28.28. In light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the degree of assault committed against the Defendant and the victim, which cannot be deemed to have arisen from the mistake of either the Defendant or one of the victims, and the degree of assault was not somewhat weak, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the circumstances leading to the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing factors revealed in the process of the trial, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.