However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 16:40 on October 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire not to sprink tobacco; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to sprinke in E-cafeteria operated by the victim D(66 years of age); and (c) took the victim’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and was faced with the victim’s head. (d) took the victim’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and was in line with the victim’s head.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them for two weeks to give treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do349, Jan. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;