When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:00 on December 23, 2014, the Defendant discovered the Defendant who is at risk of disturbance, such as walking the wall, gathering clothes, and walking the recycled envelope, who was a police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station D District D District, who was dispatched to the site after having received 112 reports, and visited the wall, and failed to comply with such request, and requested voluntary movement. As the Defendant was notified that he would arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant interfered with the handling of reporting affairs, handling of criminal affairs, and lawful performance of duties by police officers concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of a fine (including the fact that the defendant reflects in depth, the degree of violence or damage is not significant, and the fact that there is no criminal record except the disposition of suspension of indictment due to an injury);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;