If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On August 11, 2012, at around 01:40, the Defendant driven a B MT car and proceeded with one lane of the four-lane road (high-Toll-Tol-Top-Top-Top-Top-top-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-bep-si

At the time, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the motor vehicle in such a way that it does not interfere with normal traffic of other motor vehicles by thoroughly viewing the front and rear left, accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc. when intending to change the course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the victim E, who is a partner of the said K5 vehicle, to receive the part that was close in front of the left-hand side of the said K5 vehicle, which was driven in the four-lane of the said road due to the negligence of changing the course from the said four-lanes to the four-lanes of the said road, and damaged the said K5 vehicle by putting the said part back to the right-hand side of the said Maz car, and at the same time, damaged the said 5 vehicle by getting the victim E to receive approximately KRW 562,266 for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding C;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, actual condition investigation reports on traffic accidents, internal investigation reports and investigation reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that dismissed the prosecution of the instant case is in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims F among the facts charged.