On December 29, 2017, at around 05:00, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that he was scisfing at a drinking house; (b) the Defendant sent home from the E affiliated officer of the Cheongju Police Station D District; (c) obstructed the course of the patrol vehicle by leaving home from the said E, and obstructed the course of the patrol vehicle; and (d) again scisfing home from the said E to the end of the patrol vehicle, the Defendant took a bath to “a fatt fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers in the course of performing official duties, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning handling reports on 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes explaining site photographs;

1. The nature of the crime is very pleasure, such as: (a) refusing to comply with a police officer’s recommendation for returning home at the bar for the reason of sentencing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor; (b) obstructing a police officer’s course; (c) taking a bath to a police officer; and (d) drinking the patrol window; and (c) committing the same crime even if the number of forces subject to punishment for obstructing the performance of official duties was two times or more, it does not seem that the same crime was committed. The attitude of recognizing the misunderstanding and reflecting it does not appear as follows: (a) comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as o and other sentencing conditions.