beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.06 2014가단22683

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 24,49,264 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 11, 2013 to November 6, 2015; and (b) for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On May 12, 2013, at around 22:10, the Plaintiff was driving the Datoba on the three-lane road in front of the agricultural cooperative, the third-lane Kim Jong-si, the Kim Jong-si, and the Defendant was driving the Datoba, driving the Datoba, changing the course into the third-lane course, driving the Dotoba, driving the Doto a second-lane, and driving the Doto a second-lane, changing the course to the third-lane course without operating the direction, etc., and changing the course to the direction.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as salt, tension, e.g., e., dynasium due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 (including paper numbers), results of physical examination commissioned to the president of an ordinary university hospital, results of fact inquiry about E hospital, and purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident of this case.

The defendant asserts that there is no causal link with the accident of this case among the plaintiff's symptoms.

Therefore, according to the above evidence, the following facts are found at the time of the accident of this case, and the plaintiff was examined as to two parts, such as taking Brain CT photographs at the hospital on the day following the accident of this case, although the two symptoms were not revealed immediately after the accident of this case, it is recognized that there was a possibility that the two parts of the body appraisal results in the accident of this case, and that there is a possibility that the two parts of the body appraisal results in the accident of this case. Meanwhile, the plaintiff had a slin in relation to the slin inslin.

In full view of these circumstances, the symptoms shown to the Plaintiff after the instant accident occurred due to the instant accident.