The court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case to the effect that the defendant, upon obtaining approval from the victims for the use of the new building of this case, issued KRW 43,100,000 to L for the purpose and purpose of use for the registration for the preservation of ownership and received KRW 43,10,000 for the use of the new building, and delivered KRW 20,000 to L for the use of the remaining money

In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the specificity of the money entrusted with the purpose and purpose of embezzlement without failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as to the allegations in the grounds of appeal and necessary deliberations, or by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.