beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.11.28 2012고정2280

사기

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 12, 201, the Defendant knew of the facts charged, around 11:26, that the Defendant issued a written confirmation of hospitalization even if he did not actually be hospitalized at the above Council C through D (Death, November 30, 201), a secretary of the Daejeon C, who was receiving treatment by causing a traffic accident on the road before the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, by means of a traffic accident. In short, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant issued a written confirmation of hospitalization without being hospitalized at the Council C, which was the head of the office of the Daejeon C (Death, November 30, 201) and was able to obtain by fraud the compensation for hospitalization as if he was hospitalized without being hospitalized

around March 30, 201, the Defendant submitted a written claim for each insurance money to the victim KRB life insurance company around April 1, 201, and around April 1, 2011, the Defendant received a written confirmation of hospitalization from the above member to March 18, 2011, and submitted it to each victim company with the content that the Defendant was hospitalized in the above member during the above period, even though the Defendant did not have been hospitalized in the above member, and submitted it to the above member company, and received KRW 292,00 of the insurance money as the cost of hospitalization, and KRW 4,000 of the insurance money as the cost of hospitalization from the victim KRB life insurance company, and received KRW 32,000 in total from the victim KRB life insurance company as the cost of hospitalization.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted a traffic accident on March 12, 201, and was hospitalized in the above C Council members for seven days on the day and received treatment. Despite the absence of the fact of actually hospitalized as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, there was no fact of deceiving the insurance money by deceiving the Defendant as if he was hospitalized.

3. Determination

A. According to the records, the following facts are as follows: ① A physician who was hospitalized by the Defendant was a large number of patients as if they were hospitalized only on the document without being hospitalized; ② C physician was the sole doctor of the president, and E was a medical doctor of the mountain, and at night, had little knowledge about the outdoor surgery, and at night, a medical doctor and nurse.