When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a B B B B B or a car.

On December 11, 2018, the Defendant driving the above vehicle around 12:20 on December 11, 2018, and driving the road near the new ethic eths of Jung-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon into the first lane in the direction C direction from the sublim. The Defendant changed the course into two lanes.

There are three-lanes in which vehicles are frequently traveling so as to be careful to vehicle drivers and to change course, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as operating the direction light in advance, changing the lane safely, and not hindering the normal traffic of other vehicles.

However, while neglecting this, the Defendant stated that the Defendant was negligent in changing the course from the first to the second two-lane, as the part of the Defendant’s driving, the victim D and the victim’s age 49 in the facts charged is “47 years old.” However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the victim is F products and is obviously 49 years old at the time of the instant traffic accident, and thus, the victim is correct ex officio.

The left side part of the E-Stop vehicle was shocked.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment [limited to the reasonable circumstances] show the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect the instant crime.

The defendant.