In full view of the fact that the purpose of this case is to dismiss the victim, there is sufficient “a statement of fact” in the instant printed materials.

Nevertheless, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of the instant case, in so determining, erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

The summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below of this case is that the defendant is a member of the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association in the D renewal Promotion Zone in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim E is the president of the above union.

피고인은 2017. 3. 10. 경 서울 동작구 흑석동에 있는 흑석동 우체국에서, 마치 피해 자가 법령에 위반하여 부정하게 토지 감정 평가액 산정에 특혜를 받은 사실이 있는 것처럼 “ 조합장을 해임시킵니다!

Members of the Association are not interested in any death or injury, and the president of the Association who takes a letter of apology.

The head of the partnership has been allocated the two apartment bonds in lots, and one bond has been sold in June of the following year.

(The original note shall be accepted only in normal terms)

Na 2 Doctrile from 100 to 100 Doctrine, we need to keep up to 4 years,

(E) It is not whether it is the head of the partnership.

Madley chye chye chye

(b) According to the above laws and regulations, co-owners, such as the president of the E partnership, etc., may purchase only one bond, but the president of the partnership assigned two bond.

(A) The above ratio is the value obtained by dividing the unit price for appraisal by the publicly notified price.

The value is greater, and the appraised value is good.

The president of the partnership shall be given preferential treatment.

조합장 이웃 조합원님 들, 놀라고 화나셨죠.

“The removal of any printed matter and any victim made up of the terms and conditions as “.”