A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into the instant service contract with the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) around 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant engaged in voice information and value-added telecommunications service business; (b) entered into the Wifi-Rer Service Agreement (hereinafter “instant service contract”); and (c) accordingly, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with the devices (C) and services that enable the Defendant to use Wifi; and (d) the Defendant used the above communications services.

The role, structure, etc. of the Plaintiff and the Defendant under the instant service contract are basically as follows.

[In May 2016, the plaintiff and the defendant present their opinions on the amendment of some provisions (Article 4(3), Article 5(4), etc.) and separate (Omission) of the following contracts to the police officer (Article 4(3), Article 5(4), etc.) and the part of “the terms of service provision and the details of penalty for cancellation,” but the defendant did not affix his/her seal to the above contract). A B A AD C A AB A A A B A A B A B A B A B A A A (B A E)

B. Of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s transaction 1) transaction from March to May 2, 2016 under the instant service contract, the details and amount of the Defendant’s partial payment of the service charges from March 2016, the Plaintiff included each written claim in the separate sheet (the relevant monthly service charges are the same as the stated amount in the separate sheet) from February 2016 to May 2016, each of the above written claim provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant on May 15, 2015, the Japanese Eba (GL06P) 10 (unit price No. 2,900) (unit price No. 3) (unit price) and Japan’s Ebaba (04P) 100 (unit price 2,700N (unit price 12), and the Defendant provided the Plaintiff on July 25, 2015 as stated in the instant service contract, and the Defendant provided the Plaintiff on May 20, 2015 and paid the entire service charges to the Plaintiff on May 1, 25.