전부금 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment
A. Determination 1 as to the claim for full payment of the amount of the contract in this case provides that the plaintiff shall bear the obligation to pay the amount of the construction work under the contract in this case's succession. As stipulated in Article 13 (3) of the trust contract in this case, the defendant is liable to pay the amount of the construction work in this case's case's "where the trustee is unable to pay the amount of the construction work in trust property" and the defendant bears the obligation to pay the amount of the construction work in accordance with the trust contract in this case and the succession contract in this case's trust contract in this case's case's order, and the plaintiff was fully paid the amount of the construction work in this case's order against the defendant. Thus, the defendant asserts that the defendant has the obligation to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 458,252,757 won in full and 369,000,000 won in the amount of the principal of the contract in this case's transfer order in this case's case's claim as to the validity of the assignment order in this case.
If the attachment and assignment order of monetary claims is lawfully issued in the execution procedure and legally served on the obligor and the third obligor, and the immediate appeal period of one week has expired or the immediate appeal is filed and the appeal is dismissed or dismissed, the effect of repayment on the execution claim becomes effective and the compulsory execution procedure is terminated at that time.
(See Supreme Court Decision 96Da37176 delivered on November 22, 1996). However, the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act is below the same.