If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a physician belonging to the D Council member in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoyang-gu B building C.

A medical person shall keep a register of medical treatment, etc. and record the matters and opinions concerning medical practices, such as the main symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of the patient, in detail and sign thereon.

Around January 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated the address, etc. of the person who received treatment, the diagnosis result, the place of the procedure, the method of the procedure, the progress of the procedure, etc. in detail, in detail, in the said D member, that he/she performed the clock to E on both her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of customer management cards (D Council members) and electronic medical fees (D Council members)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 90 and Article 22(1) of the former Medical Service Act (Amended by Act No. 14438, Dec. 20, 2016);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00, the summary of this part of the facts charged was that both Ma (n, 48 years old) and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herb

The equipment for the rash operation is a procedure for inserting the rash by inserting the rash to the rash and the rashed floor. In such a case, the Defendant has a high risk of causing side effects, such as pain, infection, red reflects, coloring, dysing, skin dysing by blood, dysption, and dyping by rash, etc. Therefore, the Defendant has a duty of care to carefully observe the patient’s condition, etc. and to properly operate the rash to prevent the rash from inserting the rash in an accurate manner and preventing excessive rash.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and neglected to do so.