beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.07.01 2016고단578

공무집행방해

Text

The sentence against the accused shall be set forth as a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2016, around 02:20, the Defendant: (a) sent a 112-report to damage a vehicle parked in a vehicle parked in the south-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul National University of Korea; (b) on the front of the D branch of the D branch of the C branch of the D branch of the D branch of the C branch of the D branch of the Defendant’s University; and (c) sent by the Defendant, upon receiving a 112 report that the Defendant’s driver would damage the vehicle parked in the said place, sent out by G, G with a slope affiliated with the F box of the Y Police Station of the Y, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of property damage; (d) while taking a bath, the Defendant was booming the H’s face of drinking and walking the B’s bridge part of the H’s bridge at several times, and assaulted by walking the B to walk the B’

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Written statements of I, J and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts of police officers, photographs of damaged parts, and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the selection of applicable criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires the elimination of sacrificing the legitimate exercise of public authority and the establishment of legal order; the extent of violence by the defendant was considerable; the defendant recognized the crime and is in profoundly against the defendant; the defendant does not have any record of criminal punishment; the defendant appears to be a contingent crime; the mother of the defendant is expected to pay more attention to the defendant; and other circumstances shown in the trial of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, and circumstances.