However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person in charge of the operation of a factory as a factory of the BF chi-processing factory affiliated with BFC located in the Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun (hereinafter “factory”).

A person who produces, processes, ships, or stores or displays agricultural and fishery products or their processed products for the purpose of selling, or selling them shall indicate the country of origin on the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products or the processed agricultural and fishery products, and shall not put a false indication of the country of origin or put a false indication that may cause confusion therewith.

From August 9, 2013 to November 13, 2013, the Defendant purchased KRW 2,022,931,150 at the market price of Gangwon-do Agricultural Partnership, D, Ansan Agricultural Co., Ltd., Ansan Agricultural Co., Ltd., Ansan Food Distribution Center, Ansan Food and Agriculture Distribution Center, YAF branch, (ju), and (2,713,608 gg, which was located in the Namnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in order to purchase KRW 2,022,931,150 at the market price, and then processed it as a fimchi products using the distribution trend of the above Gangwon-do High-gu High-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., and processed it as a fimchi products.

As above, with respect to products processed by using the distribution of the Gangwon-do High-gu High-Tech, the Defendant falsely indicated and advertised the place of origin on the Internet homepage (F) operated at the said plant to the effect that it is “Yansan,” and sold 24,631 g of products worth KRW 114,976,368 from August 12, 2013 to November 13, 2013 to unspecified multiple consumers.

2. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of production, life guidance, purchase, sales, etc.

The Defendant, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed a false indication of origin as described in paragraph (1) with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A screen screen for the advertisement of the Domination G G;

1. B-faf course files of the Gfaf;

1. Details of the purchase by high-speed control trend by customer;

1. The details of the sale of Internet communications in the Nongchi Processing Factory (company).