A A shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person in charge of D Educational Environment Improvement Corporation ordered to C by the Suwon Education Support Agency as the head of the business department of C, and Defendant B is the representative of E Co., Ltd. who performed the work after receiving subcontracting asbestos removal work from C Co., Ltd. during the above educational environment improvement work.

Despite the fact that the aforementioned asbestos dismantling work was designed to be executed by the "F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F method, the Defendants were to perform the work differently from the design, and the Defendants were requested by the public official in charge to submit documents to prove that the work was performed by the "F F F F F F F F F F F method" in the process of approving the completion of the work, the Defendants forged the relevant documents as if they were to perform asbestos dismantling work, and submitted them to the person in charge

1. According to the aforementioned public offering of forging private documents, Defendant A sought documents related to the completion of construction works at another construction site approved as completed by F F method around October 2014 and delivered them to be referenced by Defendant B. Defendant B around that time prepared a trading list as if he/she supplied “F” amounting to KRW 7,700,000 from H Co., Ltd. with a patent of F method in the form of “the trading list” using a computer at the office of the E company located in Leecheon-si and Leecheon-si, as if he/she supplied “F” in the form of “the trading list” using the computer, and forged I’s trading list without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. Defendant B’s event of the above investigation document forged one of the trading specifications table in I’s name, and submitted it to the Educational Assistance Agency. Defendant A is the head of the Silwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and Defendant A is the Gyeonggi-do Suwon Education Assistance Agency, which is located in 792, around October 2014. The D Educational Environment Improvement Corporation, as above, did not know of the forged trading specifications.