성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The lower court’s sentence (two years of suspended execution in October, and eight hours of community service order) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is deemed to be too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case is deemed to be detrimental to the sound sexual culture and good morals, with a great social harm, with a high wave, engaging in sexual traffic intermediary activities against many and unspecified persons via the Internet, and committing the crime of this case during the suspended execution period due to the crime of this case.
However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against it, and did not repeat the crime after the crime of this case.
It is advantageous to the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.
In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, there is no special change in circumstances that may otherwise determine the sentencing conditions and the punishment different from the original judgment, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.