Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On October 9, 2014, around 23:20 on October 23:20, 2014, the Defendant laid off, and carried out openly obscene acts by cutting off, and cutting off, his sexual organ from the part of the D convenience stores located in Chuncheon City, E (the age of 33).

2. On October 10, 2014, at around 01:35, the Defendant found F (n, 25 years of age) that passed around Chuncheon F (n, 25 years of age) and commenced an act of self-defense by cutting off his sexual organ from around 10,00 to 107, around 234-16, while the Defendant continued to engage in the act of self-defense while continuing to engage in the act of self-defense in the presence of F (n, 25 years of age) and continuing to engage in the act of self-defense in the presence of F (n, 25 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.Written statements E and F:

1. Photographss of the suspect, A face, and clothes taken;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the investigation report (not more than 33 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of the punishment stipulated for the second crime with heavier judgment) shall be applicable;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Each of the crimes indicated in the reasoning for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order is an obscene act by a specific woman, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak.

However, the punishment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant has committed a crime as a primary offender in depth and is expected not to repeat the crime, the fact that he/she is aware that he/she is a military register behavior and is receiving mental treatment, and the age and career of the defendant and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, such as age and career.