명예훼손등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. Facts charged;
A. A. Around November 13, 2018, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by saying, “The victim was satisfing, once he re-satfing, and re-satisfing, he was about 100 million won” as a matter of document preparation that the Defendant requested the general affairs of the management office of the victim D, in the presence of facility staff C, etc., on November 13, 2018.
B. On November 15, 2018, at the election management office located in the same place as above 15:30 on November 15, 2018, the Defendant made a public statement of false facts and damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly alleging the fact that the victim D did not commit a sexual indecent act against the Defendant, notwithstanding the absence of the fact that the victim D committed an indecent act against the Defendant, such as the president of the E Federation and the secretariat G, etc. of the E Federation, thereby bringing the victim at the seat of hearing, and filing a complaint.
2. An offense subject to prosecution subject to prosecution (Articles 311 and 312(1) of the Criminal Act), a crime of non-violation of will (Article 307(2) and Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act). The judgment dismissing the prosecution of this case (Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)