beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단2900

간통

Text

The prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed.

Reasons

around September 2012, Defendant A and his spouse, who reported a marriage with C on February 5, 2008, met with B one time with B around the E nearby the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the District Court, and the above Defendant met with B around December 2012. around December 2, 2012, the instant facts charged against the Defendants were sent to B and one time with B around the E nearby the Gyeonggi-nam branch of the District Court, and Defendant B met with B on the same date and at the same place, even though he is aware that the said spouse is the above A, and the above crimes were committed against the above Defendant B, and the above crimes were deemed to have been annulledd or withdrawn pursuant to Article 229(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the indictment was revoked pursuant to Article 229(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, Defendant B and 231 of the Criminal Procedure Act were deemed to have been withdrawn at the time of the revocation of the divorce lawsuit by the said judgment of 2031,261.