When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 1, 2014, at around 02:05, the Defendant damaged public goods, the Defendant was arrested in a flagrant offender by insult F in the Embel located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and was traveling to the H district of the Suwon Police Station in the lower seat of the G patrol vehicle, and was using the above patrol vehicle, which is an object used by public offices, such as cutting off the back seat of the patrol vehicle on a hand, destroying the glass window of the front seat of the said patrol vehicle, and destroying one of the glass windows upon taking the head several times, thereby damaging to the extent of KRW 684,286.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the victim within the patrol vehicle, as mentioned in paragraph (1) above, destroyed the glass windows of the said patrol vehicle, and asked the victim’s left side bucks and bucks, thereby leaving the victim’s left side bucks and bucks down on the left side for about two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest and escort of police officers, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Each photograph;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate of general repair costs;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence in consideration of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the option of the punishment is divided by mistake, the beginning offender, and the fact that the victim F has agreed with each other;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On June 1, 2014, the Defendant, at around 02:05, demanded an employee of the said telecom to give police services under the influence of alcohol at Embel located in Suwon-si D, Suwon-si, and the Defendant, upon receiving a report from his employee 112, has two victims F, a police officer of the Suwon Police Station, who was called out after receiving the said employee’s 112 report.