A. The defendant of mistake of facts at the time of the instant case merely prevented him from putting his head on his chest and face in order to prevent the victim. This act does not constitute an element of the crime of injury because the defendant does not aggressive act with the intent to injure the victim.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Legal principles, even if the above act of the defendant constitutes an element of the crime of injury.

Even if this constitutes self-defense, it is not illegal.

Therefore, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The Defendant asserted the same purport as this part of the grounds for appeal in the lower court’s determination of mistake, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion and found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by providing a judgment on the lower court’s summary of evidence.

Examining and closely examining the judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below that recognized that the defendant pushed the victim on a ship, pushed the victim's flab with flab, and pushed the victim's flab, which is behind the victim's belb, divided the victim's chest and flab, and caused the flab, which requires two-time medical treatment, is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding of the facts alleged by the defendant in the judgment of the court below.

3. As long as it is recognized that the Defendant committed assault against the victim as described in the preceding paragraph at the time of the instant case, the victim was inevitable to prevent the victim from suffering from the head at the time of the instant case.