손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant’s KRW 7,952,990 on July 13, 2011 and its relation thereto to the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
1. Defendant B (Defendant)
A. In around 04:00 on July 13, 201, the injured Defendant was drunk at the D week located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant (Plaintiff) was faced with the front face with his/her own body without any justifiable reason, and her chest was broken off in a locking.
Defendant A, as the Defendant shouldered in diving or her “I am at the time”, and Defendant A her “I am at the time” used to read “I am at the time of drinking the future dog, I am at the face of Defendant A several times at the time of drinking,” and assaulted Defendant A in a way that I am at the time of drinking.
As a result, the Defendant got off the 7-day treatment to Defendant A in need of a franchisium and 28-day treatment.
2. Defendant A left her chest at the above temporary border without any reason, with the front cover of Defendant B’s body, without any reason.
Since then, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant who was broken out from the lock in question was assaulted by Defendant B, and the Defendant assaulted the Defendant by means of cutting the quizz and bombing the Defendant B’s timber as a hand saw.
As a result, the Defendant committed a 14-day medical treatment to Defendant B, such as chests and clothes, fingers, knee, shoulder and knee knee knee kne.
On October 7, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000, a fine of KRW 4,000,000 for each of the following facts constituting a crime, etc. under the Seoul Central District Court Decision 201Da26056, respectively. On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Defendant filed a request for formal trial under the same court’s 201 High Court Decision 201No6241, but the said court sentenced the same amount as the said summary order.
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant appealed against the above judgment as Seoul Central District Court 2012No2943, and the above court accepted the Plaintiff’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing on November 16, 2012, and against the Plaintiff.