beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단1120

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 1997, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Busan District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal of measurement) at the Busan District Court on September 15, 200, KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (e.g., noise) at the Busan District Court on October 8, 2010, KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (e.g., noise) at the Busan District Court on July 22, 2013.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cro-car.

1. Around 07:40 on March 22, 2014, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.071% without a driver’s license, even though the Defendant had a approximately 500-meter alcohol level at a section of approximately 500 meters from the 2nd road of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-ro 183, Ulsan-do, to the front road of the Ulsan-gu Sea Port Authority located in the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do.

2. On March 22, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.071% without a driver’s license; (b) driven the said vehicle at a speed of approximately 25-30 km per hour from the ordinary side of the Ulsan Sea Port Authority in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. Port Authority at a speed of about 25-30 km from the long side of the general side of the road.

At the same time, there is a central line, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the car line with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the center line and went to the road adjacent to the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and conflict with the front part of the victim D(the age of 49) driving EM5 car with the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the defendant needs to give approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim due to the above occupational negligence.