2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. Defendant C is the owner of the instant vehicle and the Defendant C’s wife, who is the owner of the instant vehicle and the owner of the instant vehicle.

Defendant Dongjin-jin Co., Ltd. is a company that receives and manages the instant vehicle from Defendant B.

B. On October 6, 2012, the day immediately before the accident occurred, LSMR Co., Ltd.: (a) on October 6, 2012, LST 1) transferred three of LST200 slst type type-type type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-.

3 Under the direction of the Plaintiff, Defendant C, under the direction of the Plaintiff, deducted all three equipment units of the previous equipment from the factory for about two hours in a way of inserting the trigger of the instant vehicle into the opposite part of the equipment in which the two sides of the roller board come behind.

At the time, the Plaintiff, along with J and K, viewed that the equipment of the Gu was set away from the roller, etc., along with the Plaintiff’s father, the Plaintiff had the Defendant C as a relief, such as “abrogs, ales, spawds, spawds,” etc.