beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.20 2016고단1331

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 1331" showed the same attitude that he/she was in a relationship with the victim C with the victim C at the end of March 2015, who met the victim, and the defendant was working as an executive in the distribution of Cole Day, and was promoted to the vice president of the distribution of Cole Day as of May 1, 2015, and followed the victim's defense and marriage with the victim, and developed into a relationship with the victim.

1. On April 2015, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, at the new world department shop near the new world department shop where a victim, who was in the Seocho-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, was working on April 4, 2015, paid a premium to the victim in order to operate a store operated in the distribution of tea; and (b) the victim, who made an investment in lieu of the four books, may receive a premium of KRW 50,000 per month as the profit of KRW 50 million per month.

Madon made a false statement to the effect that investment was made to take measures against plaon.

However, in fact, the defendant did not work in the distribution of teas, and even if he received the above money from the injured party, he thought that he invested in the stocks or used it as living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc., but did not have the intent or ability to make an investment in the stores operated in the distribution of teas on behalf of the injured party, or to pay the injured party the monthly profits.

The defendant, on April 27, 2015, was transferred from the victim to the national bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the defendant on April 27, 2015, from that time to that time, KRW 15 million was transferred for investment.

6. By September 2, 200, a total of KRW 140 million was remitted over 19 times as shown in the annexed list of crimes (1) as shown in the previous list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 2015, the Defendant: (a) borrowed a refund deposit; (b) the Defendant borrowed a refund deposit at the mutual infinite coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (c) the victim “Seoul Etel.”