2. While considering the following circumstances, the lower court’s sentence imposed on the Defendant is unreasonable because the Defendant’s judgment on the grounds of appeal is young, young, primary, and difficult life as a recipient of basic livelihood security, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that: (a) the nature of the crime was pleasureed; (b) the damage was not recovered; and (c) the victim was not agreed upon. The punishment determined by the lower court appears to have fully taken into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (d) there is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment is rendered.