When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 13:30 on May 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim’s face by pushing the victim’s e-te-te-te-te-te-te-te-a-a-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Statement of police statement related to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant and his defense counsel asserted that although the defendant was pushed the victim D with the victim D with his hand and breathly pushed the body of the victim D, he did not boom the victim D's breath with his breath, he did not blick the breath, and did not flick the victim F's breath with his breath.

2. According to the judgment of the court below, although the victim D was not a victim's wall of the house where the defendant was living in the vehicle, the defendant was found to have received the victim D's face, was pushed with the victim D's fingers, was sneeped with bat, bat the bat, was spherd with the bat, was spherd with the victim's bat, was spherd with the bat, and again, was spherd with the victim's bat, and the victim F and D's wife reported to the police.

In addition, the defendant asserts that the crime of violence does not constitute violence because it is not a trace of breathing the breath of the victim. However, in the crime of violence, the use of force against the body of the person is the exercise of force.