beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.11.07 2017고단2981

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On July 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol at the Yancheon-gu, Ulsan-gu, 164, Gancheon-gu, Ulsan-gu, Gansan-gu, and doing a dispute with his wife on July 29, 2017; (b) was asked the police officer of the Ulsan-gu Police Station B, B, which was dispatched upon receipt of a witness’s 112 report, about her wife and her claim; and (c) was asked the Defendant to ask the Defendant about her claim by her wife from the police officer of the Ulsan-gu Police Station B, Ulsan-gu, B, which was called.

Questions shall be made within the limit of questions.

1. The lower court held that the lower court held that the lower court held that the lower court’s lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the liability of the Defendant 1, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the liability of the lower court, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Accordingly, the police station belonging to the Ulsan Central Police Station, and the above police officer C were removed from the police station belonging to the Ulsan Central Police Station, and the Gap's arms were removed from the above police officer.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the details and degree of interference with the execution of official duties in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the criminal records of the defendant's punishment and deep reflects, etc.