A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Defendant

A (Legal Name E) and Defendant B (Legal Name F) filed a petition with the Circuit Office of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office on July 30, 2004 to the effect that the victim I (legal name J) deducted from the appearance of the K original passage to another place, and that the fire that was currently kept shall have been actually produced, and that the truth should be verified, but there is no evidence to change the fact that there was no suspicion against the victim on January 15, 2005, on the basis of the expert's opinion, the result of the expert's appraisal of the L University Basic Science Education Joint Research Institute on the timber sample taken from the fire, and that there was no evidence to change the fact that G was convicted of the crime of defamation due to the act of making a notice or making a statement as if the victim had been suspected of the crime, and thereafter, G was well aware of the fact that the victim was convicted of the crime of defamation due to the act of making a statement as to the fact that the victim was guilty of the crime of defamation.

Although there was no particular evidence as to the fact that there was a change in the appearance of the Defendants, the Defendants, at around September 22, 2009, got involved in an election campaign of N (No. O) sent to the President of the General Affairs Office, which was carried out on September 2, 2009, and, at the same time, had expressed awareness of the fact that the victims stolen the above in order to prevent the winning of the victims.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 17, 2009, the Defendant appeared at the meeting of the president of the Ma Religious Organization General Office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan City/Do branch office, and distributed printed matters with approximately 40 members of each City/Do branch office and approximately 40 members of each City/Do branch office to the clan members, and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, such as “I candidate with the president of the 24th branch office, is a theft of cultural heritage and a crime of defluority.”

B. On September 4, 2009, the Defendant appeared at a meeting of the President of City/Do Religious Office of Korea opened at the Office of General Affairs of MM Religious Organizations, and each City/Do Head of City/Do and its members.