When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates a "Cking practice room" in Busan High-gu B.

On June 22, 2015, a person who operates a singing practice room is prohibited from employing a entertainment loan and arranging it, but the defendant, around 21:20 on June 22, 2015, requested two male customers, including D (50 years of age) (50), who have found the said singing practice room, to receive 30,000 won per hour from two male customers, including the said singing practice room, and arranged for a entertainment loan by having two male customers, including D (50 years of age) who have found the said singing practice room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. A report on occurrence (in violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act and employment of helpers);

1. The defendant asserts that a karaoke machine business registration certificate [the defendant does not act as a broker, but as a customer, E et al., which is a customer, will go to the future. According to the police's statement, E and D were in conflict with each other. However, according to the evidence mentioned above, E appears to have come to the above practice room by contact with the defendant in sequence E, F came to the above practice room by contact with the defendant, and E, E, and F went to receive KRW 30,00 per hour in return for drinking together with D et al., so the defendant's contact with the above practice room constitutes an arrangement for entertainment loans. Accordingly, the defendant's argument is without merit.] The defendant's argument is without merit.

1. Article 34 (2) and Article 22 (1) 4 of the Music Industry Promotion Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;