사기
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On March 3, 2010, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a corporation office operated by the Defendant located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, via D, an employee of the said C, to the victim E and F. The Defendant was selected as a contractor for the instant G apartment reconstruction project. Upon receiving a subcontract for the removal work, the scrap metal generated in the process of the removal is equivalent to one billion won, and the proceeds of the project are equal to one billion won, and the proceeds of the project are equal to one billion won.
If the removal work is desired to be ordered, 300 million won will be changed. 300 million won will be subcontracted for the removal work, and waste disposal will also be entrusted.
The removal work shall be commenced at least eight months prior to the latest.
The victim E sent the said horses to the victim H on May 24, 2010, and around May 26, 2010, the victim E visited the said G apartment reconstruction site along with the victim E and the victim H on May 26, 2010, and re-exploited the explanation on the entrustment of removal works subcontracting and waste disposal to the victim E and the victim H.
However, on March 2010, C entered into a provisional contract with the president of G apartment reconstruction association and the president of the construction company. However, since C was merely subject to conditional selection as “the condition that two or three large construction companies participate in construction works within the 20 order of contracting with the domestic construction company,” it would be possible to implement the said condition, but the selection of the construction company could be confirmed. However, at the time, C was at least KRW 70 billion and was at least KRW 91.1% of its capital and was designated as the Korean Exchange Management Items, it was impossible to be selected as the contractor because it was impossible to implement the said condition, and therefore, even if the victims received KRW 300 million from the victims, there was no intention or ability to entrust the above removal construction works to the victims.
The defendant deceivings the victims respectively as above.