도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. Around September 13, 1993, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated an I cargo vehicle while he was loaded more than 1.3 tons at the 3rd to the 1.3 tons of the 14th to the 14th to the 14th to the 3rd to the 1993 river. The Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority.
2. The part of Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008) that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense as prescribed in Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, a fine of 200,00 won has been determined by the summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits an offense as prescribed in Article 83(1)2, the corporation shall be punished by a fine
Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant is publicly notified pursuant to Article 58 (2)