[Defendant: (a) recognized the instant crime; (b) filed an appellate brief to the effect that the sentencing of the lower judgment is unfair; (c) on the first day during which the deadline for submission of the appellate brief expired, the Defendant asserted erroneous determination of facts to the effect that no injury was inflicted on the victim in need of medical treatment for five weeks. Even if the Defendant or defense counsel stated matters not included in the appellate brief in the appellate court, it cannot be deemed that there were grounds for appeal as otherwise alleged in the statement (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 98Do1234, Sept. 22, 1998); and (d) the Defendant’s assertion of erroneous determination of facts is not determined

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of two years for six months, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant and favorable to the Defendant.

There is no circumstance in which the lower court’s determination of sentencing exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion in full view of the matters that are the conditions of sentencing, the applicable sentences, and the sentencing criteria, or it is recognized that maintaining the sentencing of the lower court is unreasonable.

In addition, considering the circumstances and results of the crime of this case, the sentence of the court below is proper, and it is not recognized that it is unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the circumstances after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.