If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On June 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was accommodated in Busan-dong Busan-dong Busan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and (b) went away from the designated place on a Sejong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si on June 13:48, 201 and went away from the designated place without the permission of the worker in charge and entered a multi-use room located adjacent to the Sejong-do-dong-dong-dong-dong

The same month

5. From 11:29 to 11:29, the 11:29 official supervisor (the assistant principal C) asked the defendant about the circumstances in which the multi-use loss occurred, and the defendant denied the facts of suspicion, and the above supervisor ordered the defendant to prepare a written confirmation of restriction on treatment prior to the investigation. However, the above supervisor knew the reason for the use of protective equipment, i.e., the defendant expressed that the defendant was able to know of the reason for the use of the protective equipment, and the above supervisor "I am am am am am k am am am k am. am. am. am we am am. am we am am. am we am we will am am am am am am. am we will not am am am am am am. am we will am we will am am am am amb and am am.... am we will am we will am am am am............. am we will we we we we we we we will am am.................

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of each working report, each letter, and each statute related to disciplinary action;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;