A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

The Defendants and E have experienced economic difficulties, such as directed the demand for the repayment of mobile phone charges, loans, etc., due to the same kind of relationship between the Defendants and E, which led to theft of the mobile phone from the mobile phone sales agency.

1. Around September 21, 2013, Defendants and E were urged to steal a mobile phone from the F in which E serves as an employee.

E notified the Defendants of the F store location and the location of the opening cell phone in the store, and the Defendants prepared criminal tools, such as physical clothes, caps, and make.

On September 24, 2013, at around 03:50 on September 24, 2013, the Defendants got out of the above F store operated by the victim H located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and Defendant A her was able to look back with a stone stone with a glass tank and then her net, and Defendant B and C have fledd with a cell phone that would be stolen by entering the store into the store, but the theft alarm device was a wind.

As a result, the Defendants jointly tried to steal the victim's property, but did not commit it but did not commit an attempted crime.

2. From October 20, 2013, Defendants 1 and 3 were willing to steal mobile phones from E and Defendant C who had worked as an employee.

Defendant

C Recognizing the password of the store entrance and the password of the release of the security device, E identified the inventory status of the cell phone and informs the Defendants, and the Defendants prepared the criminal tools, such as physical clothes, caps, and make.

On October 24, 2013, at around 03:57, the Defendants opened a door by dividing the password, which was first discovered in the above I shop operated by the victim K located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and enter the room after removing the security device. Defendant A, who had been installed in the CCTV, had had the screen prepared in advance, and reported the network. Defendant C, and B, on the magal ju City (S) 46, and gal lus (S) gal lus (S) flus) flus.