However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Special injury Defendant: (a) on November 2, 2016, on the ground that the victim, while drinking alcohol together with the victim F(28 tax) of the sexually friendly job offering E and E (28 tax) at the main point of “D” located in Seongbuk-gu, Ma-si, Sungnam-si, Ma-si; (b) on the ground that the victim, who was drinking together with the victim F(28 tax) of the sexually friendly job offering, has a

In the case of a small-scale illness, which is a dangerous object on the table table, the victim’s head was cut up twice and the victim’s face was faced by two hacks, and the victim was faced with two strings, which require approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant interfered with his/her duties by force, as stated in paragraph (1) at the date and time, at the place, and as described in paragraph (1) 1, brought a 30-minute disturbance on the floor, such as raising a spawn, raising the spawn, raising the spawn on the floor, and passing sound, thereby obstructing the victim G’s main store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2(1), 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(C) of the Criminal Act: Considering the circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the scope of recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines, the following circumstances are considered: (a) the Defendant has led to his primary offender to commit each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant has agreed with the victim of the crime of interference with business; (c) the occurrence of contingent crimes; and (d) there are other circumstances to be considered in light of the circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the scope of recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines.