When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 15, 2018, around 01:50, the Defendant reported a 1112 report in front of the first floor of the Busan Regional Police Agency, located in the city of Busan, 999, and the receiving personnel did not easily enter the first floor of the first floor of the Busan Regional Police Agency. The Defendant expressed that the Defendant “spawns, spawns, and spawns,” sent to the slope C belonging to the Busan Regional Police Agency B, who called the “spawn, spawn?,” who called the “spawn?” to the slope C.

Although the Defendant received warning and a request for returning home from C on the above assault, the Defendant obstructed police officers’ legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of general reporting cases, such as crime prevention and maintenance of order, by scambling C twice more.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. E statements;

1. CCTV CDs (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have any flabbbbial, but according to each of the above evidence, the above assertion is rejected as it can be sufficiently recognized as committing the crime in the judgment.). The application of the law is without merit.

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the degree of assault on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the content of the obstructing official duties, the fact that the Defendant has no criminal records, and the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment