When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 7, 2011, the Defendant purchased B dump truck from 2,50,000 won from 2,50,000,000 won from 2,50,000,000 won from 3,000,000 won from 2,500,000 won from 2,50,000 won from 2,50,000 won from 2,000,000 won from 2,000,000 won from 30,000,000 won from 2,000,000 won from 30,00,000,00 won from 18, 2014, the Defendant acquired the above claim and notified the Defendant of the fact that dump truck was succeeded to the above claim, and thus, the Defendant has the duty to preserve the said vehicle until the loan is refunded.

However, in violation of the above duty in 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million to C and transferred the said vehicle to C as security.

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired the financial benefits equivalent to KRW 5 million borrowed from the above C, and caused the damage equivalent to KRW 25 million to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of investigation;

1. Article 355 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 355 (2) and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;