However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 14, 2017, around 23:40 on October 14, 2017, the Defendant issued a request for presentation of an identification card to verify the identity of the Defendant by the police box affiliated with the military police box of the military police station called up after receiving a report of assault in front of the Si/Gun/Gu, and presented a resident registration certificate under the name of E, an official document which was stolen and kept on August 2010, as his/her identification mark.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

2. On October 15, 2017, around 07:19, the Defendant was investigated as the suspect status in the military police station and the criminal office in the military police station and office in the above case of assault, and as such, as mentioned above, signed the “E” on the signature column at the end of the interrogation protocol, and issued the above interrogation protocol to the assistant F belonging to the military police station in the military police station that knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged E’s signature and used forged E’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the police statements G to the defendant's legal statement E and the H's written investigation report Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 230 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 230 of the Criminal Act, Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of private signature), Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of exercising a false investigation signature), and the choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the crime of unlawful uttering of official documents for which the sentencing guidelines are set and the crime of unlawful uttering of official documents and the crime of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act between the crime of unlawful uttering of official documents and the crime

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one month to four years;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (determination of types), the scope of official document crimes, the scope of recommendations for the first category (illegal events, such as official documents).