beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.19 2018고단1655

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a taxi in K5 corporation C.

On March 16, 2018, the Defendant driven the said taxi with a light duty of 00:53 on March 16, 2018, while proceeding in the direction of a dry basin in the backside of the Gu, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the blood of the victim E (69 years old) who was going to the left to the left pursuant to the new subparagraph due to the negligence of failing to stop even though the vehicle signal was a yellow signal, which is a stop signal, in violation of the new subparagraph, even though the vehicle signal was a yellow signal, and the vehicle signal was not stopped. On the opposite line, the Defendant got the victim to go to the front part of the said taxi due to the shooting distance of the Gu, thereby getting the victim to go to the front part of the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Motor vehicle accident report (survey report) and black stuff images;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to be light, the victim's negligence appears to have been committed even with regard to the occurrence of the traffic accident in this case, the victim's punishment is not imposed upon the victim by agreement with the victim, the defendant seems to have lived faithfully without criminal records for more than 10 years since 2007, and the defendant appears to have lived faithfully without criminal records, and all other sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the order.