2. The instant crime requires strict punishment for the Defendant, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime at the main point; (b) the police officers dispatched after receiving a report; and (c) thereby insulting, assaulting, and harming the police officers; and (d) the nature of the crime was bad; and (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to fraud.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case and made a mistake against the victim E, the defendant agreed with the victim E, deposited one million won each in order to recover the damage, and paid repair expenses for the restoration of the patrol police officer's original state, etc., and other all of the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case including the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.