Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

On January 25, 2017, from around 12:07 to around 12:10 on the same day, the Defendant, from around 12:26 to around 10 on the same day, 85,00 won at the market price displayed in the C Station D Underground shopping mall 26, 'E' 'E' 'F' 85,00 won at the victim F (nives, 55 years old) lives without any cause, thereby putting them into his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts for re-issuance of photographs by cutting down CCTV images of an underground shopping mall security room and by re-issuance of the items purchased by the victim;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes the Defendant’s mistake in sentencing.

Basic living recipients are recipients.

The value of stolen goods is not significant.

However, the defendant had been punished several times, including punishment for the same kind of crime, and was under suspension of execution at the time of the crime of this case.

It was impossible to receive a letter from the injured party.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.