준강간미수등
Defendant
A Imprisonment for two years, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, Defendant B, C, and D.
Punishment of the crime
【2013Gohap42】
1. Defendant A’s bodily injury, around 05:00 on August 29, 2010, attempted to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim J(I, 28 years of age) under 201 “I” located in Mapopo-si H, Mapo-si, but in diving, Defendant A suffered bodily injury on the ground that the above victim was called “intested Mana,” and that the above victim was sent to “intest Mana,” and on the ground that the victim was sent to her face, Defendant A suffered bodily injury, i.e., internal surgery, etc., for about eight weeks of treatment.
【2013Gohap80】
2. Where any person who violates the Customs Act of Defendant A intends to import goods, he/she shall report to the head of a customs office the name, standard, quantity and price of the goods concerned, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, and in such cases, he/she shall not import goods different
Nevertheless, Defendant A conspired with K to purchase red ginseng and red ginseng in China and loaded them to the Republic of Korea. Defendant A was responsible for importing and clearance red ginseng and red ginseng on different goods; Defendant A was responsible for transporting red ginseng and red ginseng into the customs office; Defendant A, on July 23, 2008, took part in the role of transporting the container on which smuggling are loaded, and imported red ginseng 1,080 g, red ginseng 7,090 g, red ginseng 7,090 g, red ginseng 1,080 g, red ginseng g, red ginseng 7,090 g, red ginseng g, and red ginseng g, which are equivalent to the market price of 325,110,000 ( won 33,161,220 g, red ginseng g, red ginseng g, 200 g; on July 25, 2008, as if they were imported for food, reported as if they were imported, and imported as goods different from the imported goods.
【Defendant C, on February 1, 2012, was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in August 2, 2012 due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 9, 2012.
3. Defendant A, D’s violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and D’s operation of an illegal speculative game site with M and N, N’s place and provision of a game room and computer, and purchase of coophones.