However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 19, 2018, the Defendant was parked on the front of toilets in the Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-do on February 2018.

C 흰색 포터 차량에 접근하여 시정되어 있지 않은 위 차량 조수석 문을 연 다음 피해자 D가 조수석 위에 올려 둔 피해자 소유인 목걸이 2개가 들어 있는 시가 미상의 여성용 가방 1개를 가지고 나와 절취하려고 하였으나, 즉시 절취 사실을 알아챈 피해자에게 추적되어 5미터 가량 도망을 가 던 중 붙잡히는 바람에 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs, photographs of damaged articles, investigation reports (booms image analysis), photographs by capturing a black stuff image and capturing them;

1. Relevant Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The sentencing guidelines for larceny shall not apply to attempted crimes for the reason of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation, and in light of the criminal records of the defendant's like crime and the attitude of the crime in this case, the nature and circumstances of the crime are not absolutely weak.

However, the crime did not cause damage due to attempted crimes, and the defendant is detained for a certain period and is against the mistake.

In addition to this, the sentencing standards prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Code shall be integrated and determined as ordered.