특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who was engaged in driving of a 7.0 tons truck vehicle of Korea.
1. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.053% of the blood alcohol concentration in the section of approximately 100km from the 100km to the lutolutol in the lutol in the lutoo-Eup of the original city, from the street in the vicinity of the luto apartment complex in the Geum-gu, Geum-gu, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.
2. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.053% around 03:25 on the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) on September 17, 2014, and driving the said vehicle at a speed of approximately 118.8 K K points in the direction of Youngdong Highway Incheon located in the Sinju-Eup, Seodong-gu.
At the time, it is late, and its location is a two-lane expressway, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to maintain a safe distance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim's vehicle to be cut off up to one lane by being driven by the victim C (the age of 45) who is driven by the victim C (the age of 45) who is driving in the two lanes by negligence.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., for about three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and escaped without taking measures to rescue the victim, prevent danger on the road, and ensure smooth traffic flow, even though the damage was inflicted on the victim’s (in the case of the victim’s (in the case of the victim’s) red scarⅡ, cargo vehicles, etc. in the above scarⅡ, which are owned by the victim’s (in the case of the victim’s (in the case of the scar), caused danger to the road by damaging the 1,80
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;